Thread: Swindon clinch Cuthbert signing

He couldnt displace McManus.

Loads of games for St Mirren and is now at the mighty Swindon.

Ergo he is shite.

Originally Posted by weeman

He couldnt displace McManus.

Loads of games for St Mirren and is now at the mighty Swindon.

Ergo he is shite.

erm... last season despite playing/being played with injuries Mick wasnt displaced when we had 2 other CB's (O Dea and Loovins), can hardly aim that at the boy!

Originally Posted by Nas

erm... last season despite playing/being played with injuries Mick wasnt displaced when we had 2 other CB's (O Dea and Loovins), can hardly aim that at the boy!

So, he was 3rd behind McManus.

You're not doing him any favours here are you.

Originally Posted by weeman

So, he was 3rd behind McManus.

You're not doing him any favours here are you.

bollocks!!! Strachan put plenty of shite on the park, Mick at times being the biggest pile......at the expense of talent on the bench and in the reserves. You saying if you get a shout at the first team it's because yer a player??? Christ! we could have had Robbie Keane at the club and Strachan would opt for Samaras, so there's no logic in saying McManus is better than anyone just because he got a game.

Originally Posted by Zamasbhoy

bollocks!!! Strachan put plenty of shite on the park, Mick at times being the biggest pile......at the expense of talent on the bench and in the reserves. You saying if you get a shout at the first team it's because yer a player??? Christ! we could have had Robbie Keane at the club and Strachan would opt for Samaras, so there's no logic in saying McManus is better than anyone just because he got a game.

So you're saying he's good because he DIDNT get a game?

I've heard it all now.

He's saying whether he got a game under the previous manager doesn't make a difference because plenty of shite was played and plenty of good players weren't.

hi folks new user here just reading this topic and in my opinion i wouldn t say anyone in our team was really outstanding last term and arguing about a new left back when we should see how naylor gets on playing for tony mowbray should be a first option i think

Originally Posted by jaradthescot

He's saying whether he got a game under the previous manager doesn't make a difference because plenty of shite was played and plenty of good players weren't.

And he's ended up at Swindon after playing for St Mirren.

The facts don't lie. He might have played a few pish players but there were loads of them on the bench as well.

Going by Zamas's logic i could then grade myself as Celtic class as well as Strachan wouldnt give me a game either.

Originally Posted by tommy1888

hi folks new user here just reading this topic and in my opinion i wouldn t say anyone in our team was really outstanding last term and arguing about a new left back when we should see how naylor gets on playing for tony mowbray should be a first option i think

if your fishin i've bit but no disrespect mate naylors a tit and unless mowbary is a fcukin genius naylor will remain a tit.had half a dozen ok games,with a couple of good crosses for us and some were shoutin for him to get a cap.unfortunately a couple of good crosses doesn't make you a player and he went onto have a fcukin nightmare that season and last season especially.replace and chase immediately.