LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksNo that was a goal, but if we had taken half our chances it should have been 4 or 5-1, then theres no ref bullshit.Originally Posted by bryzo68
No that was a goal, but if we had taken half our chances it should have been 4 or 5-1, then theres no ref bullshit.
Celtic Legend
Fortune was inside mcgregor's exclusion zone. Easy out for the ref, he'd have disallowed it anyway.
Never thought I'd be cheering the special one, fukc Chelski.
Celtic Legend
Come on the special 1 love him hes a genius
Before Ally McCoist goes to sleep every night he checks under his bed for Victor Wanyama!
your correct my friend, the board did the same to wgs, as they did to mon.
they thought that rangers were on the ropes and we could win the league with the players we had and without spending any money on new players.backfired big time. weve also had bad runs with injuries to core players at wrong times.
but getting back to present yes we should have been burying the chances weve been making, but when your getting good goals chopped off and denied stone wall penalties, plus the opposition can kick you all over the park without getting booked never mind red carded what chance do we have when it's already stacked against us. boughera got his red card recinded last season and he kicked the aberdeen goalie inthe face he drew blood we lost the prince of goalies to crap like that. no my friend they have had to many decisions going for trhem not just against us but other teams as well for it to be coincidense never mind bloody honest mistakes .
Which one is it?
To bring John Thompson into this when we all know that was accidental and quite sad for one man died and the other had to live with it.
Celtic Legend
tbf bougherras 1 was a 50/50 and he was unlucky to catch langfield so i dnt believe it was maliscous but to compare that to a mans death which was an accident also isnt right man
Before Ally McCoist goes to sleep every night he checks under his bed for Victor Wanyama!
What that man said.
the point i was trying to make was that it was trivualising a challenge on a keeper, i should also have mentioned petre czeck the chealsea keeper.
so now we have open season on keepers the powers that be should have upheld the red card to warn players that challenges like that will not be tollerated.
but like i said his card got recinded and he could play in the next game, but scott browns did not , plus celtic have written twice to sfa asking for the criteria of video review panel they did not get an answer but when ra ra turned after getting his shirt tugged theyre now supposed to be going to look at that.
the one were we should have took our chances.
Posting Permissions 
Reply With Quote